Putin's 'Other Options' in 2022

Daniel Davis Deep Dive - A podcast by Daniel Davis

Russia's Potential Responses to NATO Expansion: Russia could have taken a range of preemptive actions to deter NATO expansion and avoid the escalation of conflict: Privately warning NATO against issuing a Membership Action Plan for Ukraine. Demonstrating seriousness by establishing permanent military bases near the Ukrainian border. Building defensive fortifications as a signal of preparedness. Modernizing Military Capabilities: Russia's failure to modernize its forces before 2022, despite lessons from recent conflicts (e.g., Armenia-Azerbaijan War of 2020), limited its initial effectiveness in the Ukraine war. Key modernization opportunities included: Investing in drone and electronic warfare capabilities. Developing advanced logistical and reconnaissance systems. Economic Diversification and Sanctions Preparedness: Russia could have reduced its vulnerability to Western sanctions by: Diversifying trade partners (e.g., expanding ties with China, India, and other BRICS countries). Reducing reliance on European gas exports. Strengthening Alliances and Influence: Russia could have: Deepened military and economic cooperation with allies like Iran and North Korea. Explored partnerships with European nations to weaken Western unity and create economic dependencies. Support for Donbas Militias: Russia could have openly supported Donetsk and Luhansk militias before 2022 by providing training, weapons, and ammunition, mirroring Western support for Ukraine. Leveraging Energy as a Political Tool: Russia might have preemptively used its gas supplies as leverage by threatening or implementing supply cuts to Europe. Strategic and Tactical Lessons: Drawing from Sun Tzu's principles, the speaker argues that avoiding direct military confrontation (e.g., through economic measures and military signaling) is less costly and more effective than full-scale war. Western Actions and Perceptions: The West, particularly NATO, is described as consistently "poking" Russia and expanding influence, framing Russia as an adversary. This narrative fueled tensions and shaped Russia's reactions. Hindsight and Missed Opportunities: The speaker critiques Russia's delayed implementation of military and economic strategies, suggesting these could have prevented the war or strengthened Russia's position if conflict became unavoidable. Core Argument: The speaker advocates that Russia could have pursued multiple non-military strategies and modernization efforts to counter perceived Western aggression and NATO expansion while avoiding the severe costs and risks of a full-scale war.