#159 Focusing on the Problems - And Business - at Hand in Your Data Tool Selection Process - Interview w/ Brandon Beidel

Data Mesh Radio - A podcast by Data as a Product Podcast Network - Mondays

Categories:

Sign up for Data Mesh Understanding's free roundtable and introduction programs here: https://landing.datameshunderstanding.com/Please Rate and Review us on your podcast app of choice!If you want to be a guest or give feedback (suggestions for topics, comments, etc.), please see hereEpisode list and links to all available episode transcripts here.Provided as a free resource by Data Mesh Understanding / Scott Hirleman. Get in touch with Scott on LinkedIn if you want to chat data mesh.Transcript for this episode (link) provided by Starburst. See their Data Mesh Summit recordings here and their great data mesh resource center here. You can download their Data Mesh for Dummies e-book (info gated) here.LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brandonbeidel/In this episode, Scott interviewed Brandon Beidel, Director of Product at Red Ventures.Some key takeaways/thoughts from Brandon's point of view:Be willing to change your mind, especially based on new information. Be willing to measure and iterate. It's easy to get attached to tools or tech because they are cool. Don't! Stay objective.It's crucial to align on what problem(s) you are trying to solve and why before moving forward on vendor/tool selection, no matter build versus buy. If it doesn't have a positive return on investment, why do the work?Beware the sunk cost fallacy! It's easy to not want to shut something down that you've spent a lot on. But don't throw good money after bad.When requirement gathering/negotiating, have a 'maniacal focus' on asking "what does this drive for the business?" You can quickly sort the nice-to-haves from the needs and you can have an open and honest conversation about cost/benefit of each aspect of a request.When thinking about maximizing value, there is always one constraint that is the bottleneck. You can optimize other things but they won't drive the value. Find and fix the value bottleneck.A simple two axes framework when thinking about use cases and requirements is value versus complexity. Look for high value low complexity first.Be open and honest in discussions around expected costs of work/tools - which can be considered part of the complexity. The data consumers understand the value and can weigh the return on investment.It's very important to understand data consumers' incentives so you can collaboratively figure out what is best for all...