Feser's Embarrassingly Bad Arguments Against Platonism | (MoR No. 65)

Ed Feser claims he has "insuperable" arguments against Platonism. He has no such thing. [ An ever-so-slightly click-baity title; but I don't think it qualifies as clickbait, since it is a perfectly accurate description :)  ] * Correction at 4:57: "Since, obviously, not all of our knowledge of ordinary particulars comes by way of direct causal contact but instead comes by way of indirect causal contact, thereby requiring a transitivity condition." Like the show? Help it grow! Consider becoming a patron (thanks!): https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason If you wanna make a one-time donation or tip (thanks!): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/josep... Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REgU-... My Playlist on God and Abstract Objects: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLx... Website: https://josephschmid.com