301 - Women Are More Likely To Cheat On Ugly Men
MGTOW Sandman Quotes - A podcast by Mgtow
Categories:
Sponsor Link:Profit Specialist Groupvideo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FV-m...https://www.cashisking.cc/Scientific Redpills - Study finds: The uglier you are, the more your wife or girlfriend wants to smash other men when she can get pregnant.https://www.goingyourownway.com/mgtow...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lkQP...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Alex and here's what he very briefly has to say: "Hi Sandman. Thank you for your hard work. I really appreciate it." Well Alex thanks for the donation and I thought I'd cover a recent post from Going your own way dot com which I've put in the description called: "Scientific Redpills - Study finds: The uglier you are, the more your wife or girlfriend wants to smash other men when she can get pregnant." Here's what someone named GrnB has to say and I quote: "Studies like this are a great read, redpills with scientific evidence. I am going to translate this into normal English. The study title is: “Women's sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability”. Which means The uglier you are, the more your wife or girlfriend wants to be with other men when she can get pregnant. Another key line reads “Normally ovulating women have been found toreport greater sexual attraction to men other than their own partners when near ovulation relative to the luteal phase” meaning that normal girlfriends and wives do not want to bang their boyfriend or husband when they can get pregnant. The article continues by saying “In a sample of 54 couples, we found that women whose partners had high developmental instability (high fluctuating asymmetry) had greater attraction to men other than their partners, and less attraction to their own partners, when fertile.” Which means out of 54 couples, girlfriends and wives who had ugly boyfriends or husbands wanted to someone else even more when they were ready to get pregnant. The final line is that “females may sometimes benefit from a strategy in which they secure investment from a long-term mate and obtain genetic benefits from extra-pair partners.” Meaning Betabux and alphafux." unquote. Thank you GrnB for posting that. What I found really funnyg about the way it's worded is that author one Steven Gangestad has to tip toe around the truth. When he says that women will go for a man with more developmental stability it's such a vague term. Does it mean he has low stability when it comes to his career and income? Or does it mean he's looks aren't the best. What exactly is high fluctuating asymmetry. Does that mean his behavior as a provider protector isn't consistent and therefore she isn't happy? Does it mean that his face isn't symmetrical and that the black pilled community is right? That's exactly what it means and it stands for FA. They measured the symmetry of men's ear length, ear width, elbow width, wrist length, length of fingers, ankle width and foot width. The study also concludes that appearance wasn't the only determining factor but male behavior. That women want the complete package or that they are more likely to look elsewhere. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Profit Specialist Group:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy