385 - Why Men Talking About Whamen Is Sexist & Misogynistic

Sponsor Link: Stoic Indifference: Manual of Basic Mental Disciplinehttps://www.amazon.co.uk/Stoic-Indiff...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCjVs...Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video isn't brought to you by any donation once. YouTube is throttling the manosphere into the ground. Hammerhand is getting slammed and his views are being dropped into oblivion even though they just monetized him. I guess that's what I'd call misandric mind games. So move over to Rumble, Odysee and Bitchute if you actually want to get my content. Links are in the description. Anyways, I read a post on the men's rights forum called When did talking about men's problems become sexist and misogynistic? The guy posting it was talking to a woman and complaining about men's issues. He was arguing that men can be discriminated upon as well as women. She argued that his arguments were misogynistic. Because vagina. Yes because talking about men being hurt as victims is also misogyny don't you know. You can't argue rationally with most whamen. Once enough men realize this we will go quiet and walk away. But were stubborn and keep coming back for second and third helpings of crazy. So why did the woman say that guys was a misogynist for bringing up the plights men face? Well if she accuses him of hating women first then he can't accuse women of hating men. That's the game. Nothing more nothing breast. The guy continued by asking everyone "Since when is talking about a certain category's issues (ie mens) racist and misogynistic just because said category is not women?" The guy mentioned that the woman he was talking to has a PHD. Guys in the comments under that post said just because you're edumacated doesn't mean you're smart. But I would say that she's very smart. She's taking out that guys ability to argue before he even begins. She knows men, her opponent but the guy she's arguing against clearly doesn't understand either male nor female nature. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Stoic Indifference:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy