The Sword of Destiny [Sword of Destiny]

By a country mile, this is the most philosophically / theologically nuanced and provocative piece of fantasy we've ever discussed. Sapkowski's grand introduction to Ciri and the dryads is genuinely stunning, providing us with the examination of xenophobia that Tolkien only ever hinted at. Through action and conversation, we come to understand Lady Eithne's tragic and desperate position as a bitter reaction to centuries of unending colonialism / imperialism. The concept of stories having hidden morals and lessons is also examined, not just at an academic level, but as an extension of religious belief and the narrativity that underpins any belief in "destiny" or "fate". We also discuss Geralt's more pragmatic definition of free will and the quiet human hierarchies of power and domination. What is "destiny" and what does it mean for someone to invoke that concept as an endorsement for their personal desires? Does Geralt truly not believe in the higher powers of this world or does he simply reject their authority over him? We end with a reexamination of Geralt's unbelief and the fundamental misunderstanding that leads Lady Eithne to call him a "nihilist". What did you think of this story and the dozens of ideas that it played with? Let us know! Feedback & Theories: [email protected] Instagram & TikTok: @secondbreakfastpod