Correcting mental models

Meg Urry shares approaches we can use to help our students correct inaccurate mental models and grasp complex information.   PODCAST NOTES: Correcting inaccurate mental models Guest: Dr. Meg Urry Connect with Meg on Twitter Interest in science At some moment it clicked and I understood what it meant. Not only was that the moment that I started to like physics, but also the moment I realized everybody can learn physics if they get this key that unlocks the door. You don’t want to leave them in the same state that I was in… of wondering why the heck we’re doing this… You want people to get over that hump and suddenly see that this is really simple, straightforward, beautiful, and useful." - Meg Urry Gender discrimination in the sciences “It was very typical for me to be one of the only women in the class and the guys just sort of took over." - Meg Urry “I always assumed that if someone claimed authority about something, that they must, indeed, know about it. It turns out lots of people do that all the time." - Meg Urry “When I entered graduate school in 1977 at John Hopkins university, it had allowed women in as undergraduates only since 1970." - Meg Urry It hasn’t been easy [for women]." - Meg Urry People who feel different than the norm (who feel outside the tribe) have a harder time learning." - Meg Urry Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J. and Handelsman, J. (2012) ‘Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), p. 16474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109. (Moss-Racusin et al., 2012) Despite efforts to recruit and retain more women, a stark gender disparity persists within academic science. Abundant research has demonstrated gender bias in many demographic groups, but has yet to experimentally investigate whether science faculty exhibit a bias against female students that could contribute to the gender disparity in academic science. In a randomized double-blind study (n = 127), science faculty from research-intensive universities rated the application materials of a student—who was randomly assigned either a male or female name—for a laboratory manager position. Faculty participants rated the male applicant as significantly more competent and hireable than the (identical) female applicant. These participants also selected a higher starting salary and offered more career mentoring to the male applicant. The gender of the faculty participants did not affect responses, such that female and male faculty were equally likely to exhibit bias against the female student. Mediation analyses indicated that the female student was less likely to be hired because she was viewed as less competent. We also assessed faculty participants’ preexisting subtle bias against women using a standard instrument and found that preexisting subtle bias against women played a moderating role, such that subtle bias against women was associated with less support for the female student, but was unrelated to reactions to the male student. These results suggest that interventions addressing faculty gender bias might advance the goal of increasing the participation of women in science."(Moss-Racusin et al., 2012) “Both the women and the men made this gender-biased judgment.” - Meg Urry Early lessons in teaching “I didn’t realize how hard these students were working.” - Meg Urry The first year, I did straight lecture intro to physics, but, I realized something was missing.” - Meg Urry Video of Eric Mazur sharing his teaching approaches Article about Eric Mazur: Twilight of the lecture Mazur Group