The Fifth Century BCE in Review

The fifth century BCE in Rome is the century that saw the idea of the republic flourish and falter only to flourish again. The plebeians rose up to fight for their rights and to enjoy the fruits of their hard work on the battlefield. The patricians held on to their prestige and power with a vice-like grip and Rome began to expand their influence in the local region. At least that’s what our ancient sources believed! Let’s review the 5th century BCE together. We’ll focus on the big themes, the ideas that were central to the century, and what was going on in the Struggle of the Orders.  Episode 154 - The Fifth Century BCE in Review It seems only fair to start with the year 509 BCE (so technically the end of the 6th century!) because that’s the year that the Romans finally booted out the kings and decided there had to be a better way to run the place. If you’re keen to go through the 5th century in ALL THE DETAIL, you’ll need to go back to our Episode 45 - The Last Gasp of the Regal Period that we recorded all the way back in 2015! Our detailed coverage of the 5th century BCE runs from Episode 45 all the way through to Episode 153 - The Plebeians Push Into Power. That’s 108 episodes on the 5th century BCE! Touchstones of the 5th century BCE We'll be taking a bird's eye look at the century that was with a focus on some key themes and developments. Tune in for a consideration of: * The Introduction of the Dictator * The Struggle of the Orders * The First and Second Plebeian Secession * The Introduction of the Tribune of the Plebs * Trouble with the Etruscans and the Volscians and the Aequians and...! * The Decemvirate and the Twelve Tables * The Dream of Agrarian Reform * The Military Tribune with Consular Power Where to from here? So after a turbulent first 100 years of the Roman Republic, what can we say for sure? * There’s tensions between the haves and the have nots. * The primary political power of Rome seems to be drawn from the gens, the extended family structure. This led to war bands like the Fabians taking it upon themselves to execute a war against their neighbours that they ultimately lost. * Rome doesn’t have anything like a formal army. If you wanted to go to war you needed to convince people to sign up. They might be willing to do that in order to protect their own lands and gens, but they might not want to if it interfered with their own prerogatives. There is some suggestion that, at times, the issue of war service was forced through internal violence. * A troubled time in the field or illness sweeping through the land could have devastating consequences. Plagues were a disaster - death and loss of life from illness could also have consequences for the next farming season. There’s plenty of tales from the 5th century that draw attention to the way that significant military losses or death from contagions resulted in famines the next year. Life was hard and there were no quick fixes. * Rome isn’t a leader in the region - far from it. They seem to have had a great proclivity for pissing off most of their neighbours without always being able to back up their ambitions with talent. The Latins and Hernicians were their major allies ...