#308: More Evidence that Benedict XVI is Pope —Matthew Hanley

The Patrick Coffin Show | Interviews with influencers | Commentary about culture | Tools for transformation - A podcast by Patrick Coffin - Fridays

Support our work: https://www.patrickcoffin.media/donate Support us by joining the Coffin Nation Community: www.coffinnation.com FOLLOW ME Telegram: https://t.me/patrickcoffinmedia Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/realpatrickcoffin/ Gab: https://gab.com/PatrickCoffin SPONSORS 👉Z Stack protocol for early Covid treatment and prevention. Get yours here: www.zstacklife.com/CoffinNation 👉My Pillow: Support true patriot Mike Lindell by getting some of his incredible US-made products here: https://www.mypillow.com/patrick ____________________________________________________ The evidence that the true Pontiff of the Catholic Church is His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI is clear and straightforward according to Matthew Hanley. The award-winning Catholic ethicist joins me this week to talk about how he came to discover the evidence that Jorge Mario Bergoglio is our latest anti-pope (after several centuries), and why this conclusion can no longer be called fringe or rad trad in nature. After this interview, you will know: The step-by-step journey taken by Hanley toward the full clarity of the evidence  The difference between the canonical crimes of the St. Gallen Mafia in the March 2013 Conclave and the Declaratio read by His Holiness on February 11, 2013 The difference between munus and ministerium and why it matters Which key word is missing from Benedict’s “abdication”  Why the evidence and its conclusion have nothing to do with sedevacantism The real meaning of antipope Clues that the Pope knows he created an Impeded See and is therefore the true office holder of the papacy What ordinary Catholics should and can do in light of this evidence Resources Mentioned Francis: The First Anti-Pope in Centuries? In Front Page magazine by Matthew Hanley The Ratzinger Code by Andrea Cionci Two-part interview with Estefanía Acosta on the canonical aspects of the Benedict Is Pope evidence and conclusion Five-part refutation of the so-called Substantial Error theory by Acosta: One, Two, Three, Four, Five